This dissertation examines the problem of extended deterrence deductively develops a theory of commitment-through-contingent irrationality, and draws upon this theory to frame a set of comparatively attractive policy recommendations. To these ends, the dissertation explores the nature, sources, and types of irrationality and irrational behavior, the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of coercive power, the various logical modes of commitment, and the various modes of nuclear coercion. These strands are fused into a theory of nuclear coercion based on contingently irrational behavior that has relevance for the problem of extended deterrence and that has important implications for US policy. Similar records in OSTI. GOV collections:.
Nuclear Weapons Persuasive Essay
"The Bombs Bursting In Air: A History Of The Effects of Atmospheric Nu" by Paul W. Bridges II
An original and comprehensive written description and analysis of a problem or problem area in international security and conflict resolution ISCOR is Iran and Nuclear Weapons. Research papers on the capacity of nuclear weapons in Iran make for any interesting report on the truth of the issue. First Stage and prior to any writing need to review the following components for an Iran and Nuclear Weapons Research Paper:. This thesis will address a new U.
Essay on Nuclear Weapons
Need an original paper? Buy Essay Now. In its attempts to harness the power of the atom, mankind has itself in the possession of weapons with unbelievable, destructive power. Nations now have the ability to destroy entire cities from hundreds of miles away, in only minutes.
The world has witnessed only two cases of the use of nuclear weapons as an argument in war: when in the United States dropped Fat Man and Little Boy onto Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Despite the horrifying destructive power of nuclear weapons, countries not only did not cease to produce them, but on the contrary, started to seek ways of gaining such weapons of mass destruction. As a result, in the 21st century, the world is sitting on a huge nuclear bomb that can be armed at any moment. Respectively, the question arises: is the role of nuclear weapons for the modern world so significant that it justifies such risks, such status quo?